Legal Opinion
Miele v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 30, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.
The defendant, a Wisconsin railroad corporation, is engaged in the operation of railroad lines in interstate commerce. It has never operated any line within the State of New York, and its lines do not run east of the State of Illinois. The present action was instituted against it for alleged damage to merchandise delivered to it in Wisconsin for shipment to New Jersey. The defendant was the first of several connecting carriers. The merchandise never came within this State. The consignor, also a Wisconsin corporation, for value assigned its cause of action for the damage in question to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. TerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McCauley v. Georgia Railroad BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- N. V. Brood en Beschuitfabriek V/H John Simons v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knight v. Pennsylvania R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Cincis v. Seaboard Air Line RailwayAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1952
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. N. V. Stoomvaart MaatschappijCity of New York Municipal Court · 1955
- Brookhouse v. Cunard White Star Ltd.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948
- Jacobson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936