N. V. Brood en Beschuitfabriek V/H John Simons v. Aluminum Co. of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.
The defendant railway company moved, under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in the City Court of the City of New York for judgment in its favor dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject of this action. That motion was denied. Upon appeal the order was affirmed by the Appellate Term, with leave to appellant to appeal to this court.
The sole question presented is whether or not subdivision 4 of section 225 of the General Corporation Law is constitutional, when applied to a cause in which the defendant foreign corporation sought to be sued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Sioux Remedy Co. v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Murnan v. Wabash Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Wertheim v. ClergueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baltimore Publishing Co. v. Swedish-America Mexico Line, Ltd.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
- De Gorter v. de FranceNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Miele v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Baltimore Publishing Co. v. Swedish-America Mexico Line, Ltd.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
- Ceravit Corp. AG v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.