Legal Opinion

Sibert v. Kubas

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1984No. Civ. 10638PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether or not a grantee’s constructive notice of a third-party interest in minerals alone precludes application of the Duhig doctrine. 1 We hold that it does not, and we affirm the judgment quieting title to the designated property, the surface and one-half of the minerals, in the defendants (collectively referred to as Kubas).

It is undisputed that the State of North Dakota owns a one-half interest in the minerals by virtue of a statutory reservation explicitly recited in a properly recorded 1952 deed. The State is not a party to this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Schuh v. Allery Ex Rel. AlleryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Schulz v. HauckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gilbertson v. CharlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nichols v. GoughnourNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gawryluk v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Acoma Oil Corp. v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kukla v. KuklaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Mau v. SchwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API