Carlin v. Donegan
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from. Saline District Court. The material facts, and the proceedings in the district court, are sufficiently stated in the opinion, infra. Donegan, plaintiff, had judgment, at the March Term 1874, for $1,077.23, and costs, and Carlin, defendant, brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This was an action brought by the defendant in error in the district court of Saline county, to settle up a partnership between himself and Carlin. The history of the case is somewhat novel. First, a jury was impanneled to whose decision was referred the terms and duration of the partnership; then the matter was referred to' a referee, to state the account between the partners; and finally, a second jury was impanneled to pass upon certain claims of Carlin for damages resulting from breaches of the partnership contract. The novelty, or…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Medved v. Novak (In Re Novak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Henderson v. DeckertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Knudson v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- United Brokers Co. v. DoseOregon Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.