Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Hunt Contracting Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. — Jno. Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice FaNCher

The Hunt Contracting Company recovered a judgment in the supreme court at Knoxville against the Mc-Dlowell Construction Company for the sum of $9,245. J. R. McDowell, who was a member of the firm composing the McDowell Construction Company, filed the hill in this case for the purpose of attaching and impounding said recovery to satisfy an indebtedness of about $8,000, alleged to be due him by the Hunt Contracting-Company. Horace M. Carr was the solicitor for the Hunt Contracting Company in the recovery bf the judgment in the supreme court at Knoxville, and a lien was declared by the court in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elderkin v. FitchIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Partee v. GoldbergTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blake v. Plus Mark, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Montgomery v. KaravasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lawson v. American Laundry MacHinery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API