Legal Opinion

Blake v. Plus Mark, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1997No. 03S01-9512-CH-00137PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Justice.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Chancery Court in a workers’ compensation case, in which the trial court granted the employee’s motion for non-suit and then entered a judgment of no liability for the employer on its counterclaim. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded.

I

On September 25, 1992, Mary Blake filed a complaint for workers’ compensation benefits against her employer, Plus Mark, Inc., and the Second Injury Fund. The complaint alleged a claim for permanent partial disability benefits. The Second Injury Fund filed an answer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. StrouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Moorehead v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Strouth v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jared v. FitzgeraldTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Soule v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. LooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Hunter v. UraTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Nagarajan v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  5. Thomas Fleming Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API