People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
This appeal presents issues of apparent first impression. We are called upon to determine: (1) the applicability of California’s Red Light Abatement Law (Pen. Code, §§ 11225-11235) to premises occupied by a publisher and used for the storage and distribution of printed matter conceded to be not obscene; and (2) the scope of injunctive relief permissible if the law is applicable. Based upon a record which establishes that the premises used for publication are also “a nerve center” for prostitution related to publication, we conclude that the Red Light Abatement Law applies.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MaitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Sorenson v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Wooten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.