Legal Opinion
People v. Maita
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1984No. A019840PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLAHERTY, J. *
Philip Joseph Maita (hereafter appellant) was found guilty after a nonjury trial of six counts of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h), seven counts of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i) and one count each of keeping a house of ill fame and keeping a house used for prostitution (Pen. Code, §§315, 316). These convictions stem from appellant’s management and ownership of the Lily Theater in Redwood City. The Lily Theater specialized in sexually explicit live entertainment. Appellant contends that his convictions cannot stand because (1) the on-stage performances at the Lily Theater were…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Webb v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.