Legal Opinion
State v. Hider
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 5, 1998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFFORD, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mark Hider appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland, Cole, J.) following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of trafficking in schedule Z drugs (Class C) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A § 1103 (Supp.1997). 1 Hider contends that the Superior Court erred in admitting illegally obtained evidence, denied his right to a speedy trial, subjected him to double jeopardy, impermissibly refused to allow him to question prosecution witnesses about his dispute with the Portland Police Department, and admitted unfairly prejudicial evidence. He also…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ChristenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Dennis F. Winchester v. State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- State v. Reynoso-HernandezSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State of Maine v. Aaron C. EngroffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
- State v. SouleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.