Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WINSTON SALEM

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1958No. 381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winborne, C. J.:

The record and case on appeal here presented contains five hundred fourteen printed pages, in which there are seventy-nine assignments of error predicated upon one hundred twelve exceptions. And in brief filed in this Court defendant appellant states nine questions as involved on this appeal. However it appearing, upon consideration of the exceptions taken, assigned as error, that in the trial below there is prejudicial error for which a new trial must be granted, it is deemed expedient to advert only to some of them.

I. Assignment of error No. 71, based upon exception No. 104,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
  3. Stansel v. McIntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Crawford v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Weston v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Taylor v. Tri-County Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Blake v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Steelman v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API