Legal Opinion
Kluchenac v. Oswald & Hess Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 21, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 12731PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McILVAINE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case have filed through their attorneys the following interrogatories to which the defendant, Oswald & Hess Co., has filed objections. Interrogatory No. 10 is as follows:
State the name and official citation of all United States and/or Pennsylvania laws, rules and regulations pertaining directly or indirectly to treatment of meats and similar products by packing companies for the destruction and/or prevention of *88staphyloeoccu aureau organisms in such food products.
The defendant’s objection is that this interrogatory seeks to have the defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Canuso v. City of Niagara FallsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Coyne v. Monongahela Connecting RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Lugo v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983