Harris v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The third party defendant objects to all the interrogatories directed to it by the plaintiff on the ground that it is not an adverse party within the meaning of Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The third party defendant is an adverse party. It answered not only the third party plaintiff’s complaint but also the plaintiff’s complaint and, therefore, is at issue with the plaintiff. The plaintiff, therefore, may serve written interrogatories upon the third party defendant. M. V. M., Inc., v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1957, 20…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- M.V.M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Niagara Duplicator Co. v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Alfred Pearson & Co. v. HayesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Webster Motor Car Co v. Packard Motor Car Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis Public Service Co. v. McMillianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Carey v. SchuldtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1957
- United States v. 19.897 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in IslipDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- American Steamship Co. v. Great Lakes Towing Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1961
- Dziedzina v. Dolphin Tanker Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.