Legal Opinion
Andrew v. Bishop
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 3, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
These two cases, tried together, arise under the law establishing a materialman’s lien.
W. C. French and J. S. French, hereinafter called French Bros:, in 1931 entered into a contract with the Town of Windham to build a high school building, and gave a bond for the full completion of the same.
Defendant George Bishop contracted with French Bros, to do the plastering, and furnish plastering material. He secured material and did the plastering.
Of the material that Bishop furnished, plaintiff claimed to have sold him, on open account, an amount worth $899.02. No part of this sum having been paid,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Vreeland v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bangor Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Robbins Plumbing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Bellegarde Custom Kitchens v. LeavittSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- John W. Goodwin, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.