Legal Opinion

Overton Const. Co. v. First State Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1985No. 84-238PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This is the second appeal of a case involving a default judgment on a promissory note. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(j).

The appellants executed a promissory note to the appellee which was secured by a mortgage on real property. When the appellants defaulted, the appellee filed a complaint to foreclose on the property. The appellants asserted usury as a defense in their answer to the complaint.

The trial court found the note was not usurious under the governing federal law. That ruling was appealed to this court and we affirmed in part, reversed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Sanders v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. American Natl. Ins. Co. v. LairdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Overton Construction, Inc. v. First State Bank, SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Harper v. Nash Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alexander v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Worth v. CIV. SERVICE COM'N OF EL DORADOSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. In Re Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  5. Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Lourie Brown and Monique BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API