Alexander v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This is the second appeal in this medical malpractice case. For the second time, a jury returned a verdict for the defendant. In the first appeal, the only issue presented was whether the trial tactics used by the defense attorneys were so objectionable as to require retrial. We reversed and remanded on that basis. Alexander v. Chapman, 289 Ark. 238, 711 S.W.2d 765 (1986).
At both trials, the judge used AMI 1501 to instruct the jury on a physician’s duty of care; but at the second trial, the appellant objected. AMI 1501 provides that a physician must possess and, using…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Woodward v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Norris v. BristowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Sanders v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Alexander v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Moore v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Clemmons v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Chambers v. SternSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- McLane Co., Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.