Stanton v. Miller
New York Supreme Court
MOTION by the plaintiffs for a new trial, under section 268 of the Code of Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Talcott, J.
It is claimed by the defendant that the plaintiffs’ attorney has misconceived the practice, and that this is not a case where the plaintiffs are entitled to move for a new-trial under section 268 of the Code. The action is in equity, and was commenced to compel the delivery to the plaintiffs of a deed to some of them which had been signed and sealed, and acknowledged by Mrs. Mary Miller, in her lifetime, and deposited with the defendant Benedict as an escrow, subject to the performance of a contract made between the said Mary Miller and the plaintiff Oliver Stanton,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Parsell v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Hatch v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Ruggles v. LawsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Belden v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Taft v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Baum's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- McGinniss v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
- Tombler v. SumpterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.