Legal Opinion

American Exchange Trust Co. v. Trumann Special School District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The law is well settled that school districts are not only authorized to exercise the powers that are expressly granted by statute, but also such powers as may be fairly implied therefrom, and from the duties which are expressly imposed upon them, and such powers are implied when the exercise thereof is clearly necessary to enable them to carry out and perform the duties legally imposed upon them. Andrews Company v. Delight Special School District, 95 Ark. 26, 128 S. W. 361.

It is also true that all special school districts in the State are authorized and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. H. Andrews Co. v. Delight Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Schmutz v. Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Williams v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. BlankenshipDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
  2. Harper v. Wheatley Implement Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. American Physicians Insurance Co. v. HruskaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Romer v. LeynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. In Re Eugene Morris, Debtor. Worthen Bank & Trust Company, N. A. v. Eugene Morris and A. L. Tenney, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API