Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Craig

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The record shows that appellant, Federal Land Blank of St. Louis, Missouri, and the El Dorado National Farm Loan Association of El Dorado, Arkansas, are both incorporated under an act of Congress of the United States, but that they are separate and distinct corporations. The loan by. appellant to Craig was obtained by Brown, as secretary of the El Dorado National Farm Loan Association; and, without reciting the evidence in detail, we are of the opinion that the chancellor was justified in holding that Brown, as secretary of said association, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White-Wilson-Drew Co. v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Boozer v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  3. Arden Lumber Co. v. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Bank of Holly Grove v. SudburySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. BlankenshipDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1959
  2. Romer v. LeynerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Southeast Arkansas Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. American Casualty Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  5. American Exchange Trust Co. v. Trumann Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API