Legal Opinion

Kaylor-Trent v. John C. Bonewicz, P.C.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 9, 2013No. 11-3332PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Pursuant to Judgment (d/e 27). Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Applying an hourly rate of $125 to the hours reasonably expended, Plaintiffs attorneys are entitled to attorney fees totaling $9,700. Plaintiffs Bill of Costs is allowed in the amount of $934.05.

I. BACKGROUND

In August 2011, Plaintiff, Stephanie Kaylor-Trent, filed suit against Defendant, *881John C. Bonewicz, P.C., pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) (15 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Arsenia Tolentino, and v. Lawrence Friedman, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Brian Uphoff and David Damon, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Employees v. Elegant Bath, Ltd., Chuck Does It All, Inc., and Charles L. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bratton v. Thomas Law Firm, PCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
  2. Bempah v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. FRANKLIN v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025
  4. Howard v. Credit Collection Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024
  5. PURNELL v. LONG ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API