Legal Opinion

State v. Huggins

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1982No. 13512PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Orval Edward Huggins, Jr. was on trial for assault with intent to commit rape. At the close of the state’s case Huggins moved to dismiss, urging, as one of his grounds, that the information failed to allege that Huggins and the complainant were not married at the time of the alleged assault. On the ground that the state failed to prove absence of marriage, the trial court granted the motion and the state moved, unsuccessfully, to reopen its case. The state appealed the order dismissing the information. We affirm the order.

Initially, in its brief, the state raised three…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HugginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. RodriquezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. HughesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. SenaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. BoltonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API