Legal Opinion
State v. Bolton
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 1991No. 17871PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Judge.
Following a jury trial on one count of rape, I.C. § 18-6101(3), the jury found Karl Bolton guilty of battery with intent to commit rape, I.C. § 18-911, and the district court imposed a unified sentence of fifteen years in the custody of the Board of Correction with a five-year minimum period of confinement. Bolton appeals from the judgment of conviction arguing that the jury’s verdict is inconsistent with its findings, that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, and that the sentence imposed is excessive. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
The events leading to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MedranoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. PeiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. NunezIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BahrIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. MonroeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.