Ackerson v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of Missouri
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentMurray, Justice
I am not in accord with the opinion herein delivered on March 28, 1934, and have decided to here express my contrary views.
The effect of the majority opinion, as I understand it, is to hold that where an appeal is perfected by an indigent person by making 'the affidavit provided for in article 2266, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts 1931, 42d Leg., p. 226, c. 134 (Vernon’s Ann. Oiv. St. art. 2266), an entirely different method of appeal is pursued from an appeal perfected by the giving of an appeal bond, as provided for in article 2265, and that such an appeal is not governed by the provisions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ziegler v. HuntTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Hunter v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Barcus v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Gerneth v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.