Legal Opinion

Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. Lane

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1891No. 2991PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Trinity. Tried below before Hon. N. G-. Kittrell.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

This was an action for personal injuries, brought by appellee against the appellant corporation. The appellee took service as a brakeman on a train of the Missouri Pacific Bailway Company. The train, being operated upon appellant’s road, passed on to a side track, where it became his duty to uncouple the cars. The side track, as he testified, was badly constructed and was uneven, and was not filled in between the ties. On account of the unevenness of the track, as he further testified, the cars being in motion, he was unable to uncouple them while remaining upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BeasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. BeasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Houston East & West Texas Ry. Co. v. McHowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API