Indiana Bell Tel. Co. Inc. v. Boyd
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
George Luddington initiated these proceedings by filing a complaint with the Indiana Civil Rights Commission (Commission) alleging that his employer, Indiana Bell Telephone Company (Bell), had committed a discriminatory act against him on the basis of race, in violation of the Indiana Civil Rights Law 1 (Ind. Code 22-9-1 et seq.). Following a hearing at which evi dence was presented, the hearing officer concluded Bell was “guilty of a discriminatory act,” and recommended Bell pay Lud-dington damages. The hearing officer’s findings, conclusions, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Department of Financial Institutions v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. City of MuncieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Indiana Department of Correction v. Indiana Civil Rights CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ali v. Greater Fort Wayne Chamber of CommerceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Filter Specialists, Inc. v. BrooksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Weatherbee v. Indiana Civil Rights CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.