Legal Opinion
MIMICS, Inc. v. Village of Angel Fire
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2005No. 03-2214PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs-Appellees Richard Wildgrube, Margaret Wildgrube, and MIMICS, Inc. (hereinafter and collectively, the “Wild-grubes”) brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging rights violations under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments. DefendanWAppellant Charles Hasford appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment premised on qualified immunity. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
II. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Anderson v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Bliss v. FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- A.M. Ex Rel. F.M. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Teigen v. RenfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.