Bradley Ray McClintock v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
Michael Massengale, Justice
This case was remanded to us by the Court of Criminal Appeals. McClintock v. State, 444 S.W.3d 15 (Tex.Crim.App.2014). That Court affirmed our initial analysis and remanded to address in the first instance an issue first raised in the State’s petition for discretionary review. On remand, we must determine whether, under the facts of this case, an officer’s good-faith reliance on binding appellate precedent operates as an exception to both the federal exclusionary rule and Texas exclusionary statute. See id. at 20-21.
We conclude that the judge-made…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- McClintock, Bradley RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. Albert Tyrone BernardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Mario Alberto Siller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2016
- Mario Alberto Siller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.