Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 25, 1983No. 29-78; CA A21748PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*343VANHOOMISSEN, J.
In our earlier opinion, we reversed a finding by the Commissioner that petitioner had committed an unlawful employment practice under ORS 659.030(1) (1975) by discriminating against claimant because of her sex. We upheld the Commissioner’s finding that petitioner had unlawfully retaliated against claimant because of her complaints of discrimination. ORS 659.030(4) (1975). We therefore reversed the Commissioner’s award of back pay; however, we remanded a damage award of $15,000 for emotional distress, which at one point in the Commissioner’s findings was tied only to…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Walker v. Van LaninghamColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Seitz v. State Ex Rel. Albina Human Resources Center & the Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.