Legal Opinion
Walker v. Van Laningham
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 2006No. 05CA0564PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
In this case alleging claims for abuse of process and civil conspiracy, plaintiffs, Samuel and Diane Walker, appeal the district court’s judgment granting the motion to dismiss of defendants, Roger Van Laningham, Barbara Van Laningham, Leslie Ezell, Katherine Ezell, Jeff Jones, and Cheryl Jones (Neighbors), and awarding Neighbors attorney fees. We affirm and remand for. an award of appellate attorney fees.
The Walkers purchased a forty-acre parcel of land in Teller County on which they operated a dog kennel and raised, trained, and raced sled dogs. 'They were subject to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Thomas v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Hertz v. Luzenac GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Pompa v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.