Legal Opinion

Russo v. Conde Nast Publications

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 17, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-1219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court is the defendant Gentleman’s Quarterly (“GQ’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 56 dismissing plaintiff’s claims against it in the captioned matter with prejudice. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties this matter was deemed submitted on the briefs as of November 4, 1992.

Plaintiff Perry Raymond Russo (“Russo”) has asserted claims pursuant to both state and federal law for defamation on the basis that a GQ article (i.e., an Advance magazine) described Russo, the prosecution’s star witness in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Joseph Thomas v. Dale E. FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Clay L. Shaw v. Jim Garrison, Individually, and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Madison v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. WFAA-TV, Inc. v. McLemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Daigle v. ComputracDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API