American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. McMullin
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Charles McMullin appeals from summary judgment declaring that plaintiff American Family Mutual Insurance Company has no duty to defend or provide coverage for any judgment arising out of a malicious prosecution action filed against defendant. We affirm.
Defendant raises one point on appeal. He alleges the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the underlying malicious prosecution action occurred while the policies were in force. Specifically, he contends that the critical date was either the day the jury verdict was returned or when this court’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- S. Freedman & Sons, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harbor Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Harbor InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Roess v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Harbor InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- American Safety Casualty Insurance v. City of WaukeganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Genesis Insurance v. City of Council BluffsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- City of Lee's Summit v. Missouri Public Entity Risk ManagementMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.