Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. McKusick v. Houghton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1927No. 26,015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 213 N.W. 907. The appeal is from an order refusing either to amend the findings or grant a new trial.

The action is mandamus to compel the building inspector of the city of Minneapolis to issue a building permit to relator. The findings were in favor of defendant. In this court the chief attack is directed against the validity of the set-back provision of the zoning ordinance. Incidentally certain findings of fact are challenged as without support, and rulings during the trial are assailed.

Relator's property is 60 feet front on the easterly side of Grand avenue, the south…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boardman v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. City of Miami v. RomerSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. McCavic v. DeLucaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. James S. Holden Co. v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Moore v. City of PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API