McCavic v. DeLuca
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Appeals from orders denying new trials. Two cases, identical in all respects except as to the property owned by the respective plaintiffs, have been consolidated for hearing and have been considered here together.
The city of Virginia, Minnesota, has adopted no general zoning ordinance. It has, by ordinance, established building lines for certain designated streets providing for a building or setback line 15 feet from a street or avenue.
Defendant owns lot 30 of block 12, Eooney’s Addition to Virginia. Plaintiffs McCavic own lot 31, which adjoins defendant’s lot on the west,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Acker v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Loud v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Leigh v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Moore v. PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Zelios v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- City of Beatrice v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.