Legal Opinion

Guriel v. Scott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1963No. Appeals, 296 and 297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

Following this intersection collision, Mrs. Guriel, the driver of one of the cars and Mrs. Ricci, her passenger, brought separate actions against the defendant Scott. Scott added Mrs. Guriel as an additional defendant in Mrs. Ricci’s action. The jury found both drivers negligent, bringing in a verdict for the defendant in Mrs. Guriel’s case and for the plaintiff against both Mr. Scott and Mrs. Guriel in Mrs. Ricci’s case. Mrs. Ricci received a verdict of |300.

The court below granted a new trial in both cases because there was no evidence of Mrs, Guriel’s negligence in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lieberman v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Huderson v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Van Huderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. In re New Restaurant Liquor License Caracciolo t/d/b/a Pirates Cove, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1982
  3. Signor v. Johnson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API