Burger v. Roelsch
New York Supreme Court
Action by Eobert E. Burger against William D, Eoelsch and Elizabeth Eoelsch for breach of contract. Defendants' motion for a new trial was ordered to be heard in the first instance at general term, after a verdict directed in favor of plaintiff at the Erie circuit.. Granted.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The parties entered into' a written contract on the-18th day of June, 1892, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to provide the materials and construct for the defendants a three-story brick building on Chenango street, in the city of Buffalo, for-*461the consideration of $9,800, according to certain plans and specifications furnished by the defendant, and forming part of the contract. The lot upon which the building was to be located was 30 feet front • and rear, and 92 feet in depth. The plans located the front of the proposed building upon the line of Chenango street, and called for bay…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Gillet v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Strait v. National Harrow Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bebb v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Euclid Holding Co. v. SchulteCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Higgins v. QuigleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Hart v. City Theaters Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- Hess v. AllenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.