Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Quigley
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1899No. 2,683PublishedCited by 3 opinions
.From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Comstock, C. J. —
On the 1st day of August, 1893, appellants Olive and Long entered into a building contract with appellee, giving a bond in the penal sum of $2,000, with appellants Higgins and McDaniel as sureties thereon.
The complaint charges that on the 14th day of September, *349after the execution of the original contract and bond, a second agreement modifying the original contract was entered into between the principal contractors. It is alleged that this second agreement was signed on behalf of both appellees by appellee Mary Quigley.
The exhibit filed with the complaint shows the new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Consaul v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Howard County v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Grant v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- American Surety Co. v. LauberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hedrick v. RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- State ex rel. Interstate Public Service Co. v. LundIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Mankedick v. Consolidated Coal & Lime Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900