Legal Opinion

Bebb v. Jordan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1920No. 15602PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered February 14, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action the plaintiffs, Bebb & Gould, sued to recover from the defendant, Jordan, some $10,058.16, for services rendered as architects in designing and drawing plans and specifications for an apartment building which the defendant contemplated constructing’. After issue joined, the action was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and a judgment was awarded the plaintiffs in the sum of $4,071.80. From this judgment, both parties appeal.

The record discloses that, sometime in October, 1916, the defendant, being then the owner of a vacant lot in the city of Seattle, conceived the idea…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. HinckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hart v. . City Theatres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Building Commission v. KuninMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Nave v. McGraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. City of Olympia v. MannWashington Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Howard v. UsiakSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. Junge's Appeal. (No. 2.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Parrish v. TahtarasUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jones v. BrisbinWashington Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API