Legal Opinion
Linville v. UNITED AUTO WORKERS OF AMERICA
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 1, 2006No. Civ.A. 2:05-0104PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COPENHAVER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendants’ motion, filed October 6, 2005, seeking dismissal and/or summary judgment on plaintiffs claims. 1
I
According to the allegations in his complaint, prior to September 1, 2000, plaintiff Larry Linville was an hourly employee of Mayflower Vehicle Systems (“Mayflower”). (Comply 4.) Linville worked in Mayflower’s maintenance department and was a member of the defendant union, United Auto Workers of America, Local 3399 (“union”). On or around September 1, 2000, Linville was approached by a member of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Local Union 71District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022