Legal Opinion
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of Glendale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 3, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0341PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINTHROP, Judge.
¶ 1 The Tohono O’odham Nation (“Nation”) appeals the grant of summary judgment to the City of Glendale (“Glendale”) on Nation’s challenge to Glendale’s purported annexation of real property owned by Nation. For the reasons that follow, we hold that when the validity of a municipality’s annexation ordinance is timely challenged in court, the annexation does not automatically become final thirty days after the ordinance was adopted. Accordingly, we reverse the grant of summary judgment in favor of Glendale and re mand for entry of judgment in favor of Nation.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Anderson v. Country Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Airport Properties v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Respect the Promise in Opposition to R-14-02-Neighbors for a Better Glendale v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011