Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. BTU Block & Concrete Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 1996No. 17047PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.(1) Worker appeals from a compensation order entered by the Workers’ Compensation Administration. (WCA). She contends that the WCA failed to award her the full benefits to which she was entitled for temporary total disability. We agree. We reverse and remand for entry of an amended compensation order.
BACKGROUND(2) Worker was employed by BTU Block & Concrete Company (Employer) as a truck driver from August 30, 1994 until November 22, 1994. Dining her employment she was repeatedly reprimanded for failing to obey instructions and for other deficiencies in her job performance.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Aranda v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Paternoster v. La Cuesta Cabinets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jeffrey v. Hays Plumbing & HeatingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dielectric Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Baca v. LOS LUNAS COMMUNITY PROGRAMSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Connick v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gurule v. Dicaperl Minerals Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.