Gurule v. Dicaperl Minerals Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} The question before us is how to calculate the reduction in the number of weeks of permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits, as set forth in NMSA 1978, § 52-l-42(B) (1990), when a worker has received partial temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 52-l-25.1(C) (1990). We hold that the language of Section 52-l-42(B) authorizes a reduction of one week of PPD benefits for each week of TTD benefits paid, regardless of the percentage of TTD actually paid. Accordingly, we affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of Employer.
I. BACKGROUND
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chavez v. Mountain States ConstructorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Draper v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Ortiz v. BTU Block & Concrete Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of Garcia v. Mt. Taylor Millwork, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Grubelnik v. Four-Four, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Baca v. LOS LUNAS COMMUNITY PROGRAMSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Baker v. Endeavor Servs.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Moya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Moya v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.