Royer v. Stoody Company
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CHANDLER, Chief Judge.
This action is brought by plaintiffs Clady Royer, Blanton W. Hoover and James T. Hoover, doing business as Track Service Company, against the defendant Stoody Company for damages and injunctive relief, and is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability only and on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs’ company, among other things, repairs and rebuilds used rollers on track type equipment and in 1958 developed a new method of rebuilding such rollers by flame hardening the flanges on the rollers. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- National Lead Co. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hollymatic Corp. v. Holly Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Aerosonic Corporation and MacLeod Instrument Corporation v. Trodyne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.