Legal Opinion
System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 24, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-250PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs come before this Court seeking a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from disparaging plaintiffs’ product and interfering with a contractual relationship. This is one aspect of a three part complaint alleging violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. and the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 12 et seq., and requesting a declaratory judgment as to validity of certain patents asserted by one of the defendants. 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.; 28 U.S.C. § 2201, § 2202. Subject-matter…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Liebe v. City Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Riblet Tramway Co. v. Ericksen Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Resident Advisory Board v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.