Legal Opinion

Tolman v. Clark County Drainage Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 13, 1932No. 4835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, residents of Illinois, brought this suit against appellees, residents of Wisconsin, to obtain an accounting and to restrain and compel action protective of their asserted rights. Federal court jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the amount involved, which exceeds $3,000.

The controverted issues arose out of the establishment of a drainage district comprising 98,000 acres of Wisconsin land located in Jackson and Clark Counties and the'sale of $172,000 of 6% bonds, the proceeds of which were largely used in paying for the nosessary ditch…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. La VigneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Dancy Drainage District v. Hanchett Bond Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In re Dancy Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. Wood CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City & County of Dallas Levee Improvement Dist. ex rel. Simond v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API