Legal Opinion

Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 31, 2006No. Consol. 05-00560Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALLACH, Judge.

I

Introduction

Plaintiff, Nankai Seiko Co., Ltd. (“Nan-kai” or “Plaintiff’), requests permission to file an Amended Complaint pursuant to USCIT R. 15(a). Nankai’s original Complaint included two counts challenging the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Defendant”) change in model-match methodology and the methodology applied to select between equally similar comparison models. Specifically, Nankai wishes to amend its Complaint to challenge Commerce’s application of zeroing in the determination of Nankai’s anti-dumping duty margins.

II

Background

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Corus Staal BV v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Intrepid v. Mamie E. Pollock, District Director of Customs, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Nsk Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API