Hoffman v. Niagra MacH. and Tool Works Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.
On September 4, 1987, following four (4) days of trial, a jury returned a verdict in the above-captioned action in favor of the defendant Niagra Machine and Tool Works (“Niagra”) and against the plaintiffs Robert and Florence Hoffman. Judgment was entered thereon accordingly. Presently before us is the plaintiffs’ Motion For A New Trial or Judgment N.O.V. Unfortunately, plaintiff’s counsel has not submitted a memorandum of law in support of his Motion. As a result thereof, and understandably so, defendant’s counsel has also not submitted a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lewis v. Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-NortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Verge v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Eck v. Powermatic HoudailleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mark W. Heckman v. The Federal Press Company, Allen Bradley Company C/o Corporation Trust Company v. Clark Equipment Company, Brown Trailer DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benzel v. Keller Industries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Martinez v. Triad Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Fisher v. Walsh Parts & Service Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Fisher v. Walsh Parts & Service Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003