Legal Opinion

Verge v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 8, 1978No. 77-1064PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge

We must address, in this case, a little-litigated subtlety of products liability law: On whom to place design responsibilities where a product has been manufactured and assembled in more than one stage. Because we conclude that the Ford Motor Company was not responsible for the design defect here, we hold that the district court erred in denying Ford’s Motion for Judgment n.o.v.

I

The plaintiff, Jesus Garcia Verge, was an employee of the Government of the Virgin Island’s Department of Pub-*44lie Works Sanitation Division. He worked on a garbage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  3. State Stove Manufacturing Company v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Gomes v. BrodhurstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Robert C. Schell and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Amf, Incorporated, and Third-Party v. Capital Bakers, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. GMC v. Saenz on Behalf of SaenzTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Michalko v. Cooke Color & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Moran v. G. & W.H. Corson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API