Larsen v. Sedberry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
The only question for resolution on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for plaintiff and in failing to grant summary judgment for defendant based on the doctrine of laches in that plaintiff did not seek enforcement of the child support order until fourteen years after it was entered and until after Johnson died. We resolve the question in favor of plaintiff.
We are not unmindful of the policy consideration that produced the doctrine of laches:
The doctrine of laches is based upon grounds of public policy, which require for the peace of society…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacKall v. CasilearSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Stell v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- McRorie v. QueryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lundh v. FontanaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Malinak v. MalinakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015