Legal Opinion

Lundh v. Fontana

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 21, 1986No. 0686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal of two circuit decrees which affirmed orders of the probate court charging the decedent Andrew William Fontana’s estate with claims for child support arrearages and rent due the decedent’s brother, respondent Joseph James Fontana. The probate court also found that certain personal property used by the decedent prior to his death was owned jointly by decedent and his *532brother. The executrix, sole heir of decedent, appeals. We affirm.

Andrew William Fontana died testate on June 22, 1982 naming appellant Juanita K. Brown as his executrix and sole heir.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Ex Parte JeterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Byars v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Moultis v. DegenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. SC DSS Ex Rel. Texas v. HoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Pierce v. HigginsDelaware Family Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API