Legal Opinion

Stell v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Defendants contend the nonsuit should be sustained upon two grounds: (1) laches on the part of the plaintiffs, and (2) a valid tax deed to the defendants’ intestate.

1. Laches on the part of claimants is recognized by courts of equity, in proper cases, as an available defense against stale claims. It is generally defined to mean negligent omission for an unreasonable time to assert a right enforceable in equity. 30 C. J. S., 520; 19 Am. Jur., 338; Black’s Law Dictionary. “Laches is such delay in enforcing one’s rights as works disadvantage to another.” 30 C. J. S., 520. It may be invoked as a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Rousseau v. . CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Orange County v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Ferguson v. . BlanchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Waynick v. ReardonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. East Side Builders, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API