Legal Opinion
Testa v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 12, 1999No. AC 17775PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Michael Testa, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant civil service commission of the city of Waterbury (commission)1 on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because there was no statutory authority to bring the appeal. The plaintiff claims that the Superior Court improperly determined that § 1931 of the charter of the city of Waterbury (city charter) allows appeals only from department decisions and, therefore, a decision from the commission, which is not a department,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Allied Plywood, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Fennell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Nauss v. PinkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LacksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Alexander v. Retirement BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hefti v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- AEL Realty Holdings, Inc. v. Board of RepresentativesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Demarest v. Norwalk Fire Department, No. Cv 98 0165007 S (Mar. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.